Midterm Sample/Clarification
My meetings on paper topics revealed more
misunderstandings of the midterm than I would have expected.
Here is the text of the assignment,
again:
As a springboard in this direction,
your midterm will be takehome: 3-4 pages about one of the secondary articles,
an article it cites, and an article that cites it. You should offer a paragraph
précis of each article, and provide an analysis of the engagement of the one
article with the other, and an argument about the conversation that takes
place. Ideally, this is the conversation you will enter in your final paper.
As I explained, one or more of the
articles can be a book.
Here is an example of the kind of thing I
have in mind. Bruce Burgett, “The History of X in Early
America” Early American Literature 44:1 (January 2009) pp. 215-225.
Cites Block, Sharon, and Kathleen M. Brown, eds.
“Sexuality in Early America.” Special
issue of The William and Mary Quarterly 60.1 (January
2003).
*Block & Brown’s introduction, Sharon Block and Ruth Brown, “Clio in
Search of Eros: Redefining Sexualities in Early America” The William and Mary Quarterly, Third Series, Vol. 60, No. 1, (Jan., 2003), pp. 5-12. Cites
Edmund S.
Morgan, "The Puritans and Sex," New
England Quarterly, 15 (1942), p. 591-607.
If I were doing
the assignment, I’d summarize each separately, and then discuss the
relationship among the three works, making an argument about the conversation they are in, and thus entering the conversation myself. You should begin your paper like a review
essay, with full bibliographical citations for your three articles/books.
Here are the articles, for your review:
Download Burgett
Download Block and Brown
Download Morgan*This is a bit
of a wrinkle, b/c Burgett cites the whole issue, not a specific article.
Ignore the changes in font color -- something is effed up w/ the Typepad interface.
Posted by: The Gurgling Cod | 10/07/2009 at 05:45 PM